Many high profile Republicans are advising conservatives not to put up too much resistance to Judge Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court. Their argument is that opposition to her appointment would further alienate Hispanic and other minority voters making future Republican gains more difficult. Republicans taking this position demonstrate their inability to learn from past experience.
They are the same Republicans who gave us “moderate” John McCain as a presidential candidate in the last election. They are also the ones who describe the Republican Party as the “party of the big tent”. A more accurate label would be the “party of losers”.
Losing is something at which the Republicans have a lot of experience. They have been consistently doing it since the early twentieth century. The few wins they have experienced have been short lived. When they do win, they repeatedly fail to build on those victories, and the benefits they gain soon give way to the persistent counter-attacks of the Democratic Party.
Contrast the Republican’s experience at losing with the Democrat’s experience at winning and you get a completely different picture. Franklin Roosevelt taught the Democrats how to win and they have been building on those wins ever since. Decade after decade they have persistently advanced their agenda. They never concede defeat. Devastating losses, such as those delivered by Reagan and Gingrich are only temporary setbacks. They always comeback stronger than before, never changing their goals or tactics.
Those who argue that negative criticism of the opposition is counterproductive have not been paying attention to the manifold successes of the Democratic Party, particularly over the past eight years. Every decision or policy of George W. Bush was consistently criticized and every appointee was demonized. These tactics drove the popularity of Bush to historical lows with little if any negative consequences to the Democratic Party.
The same techniques were used against Judge Bork, Justices Thomas, Roberts and Alito, as well as Attorneys General Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales among others, all without negative consequences to the Democrats. I am not suggesting that Republicans ought to use the same tactics. I am suggesting that we need to forget about our fears of repercussions and the mistaken fantasy that we can win over minorities and independents by compromising our principles and accepting the premises behind the Democrat’s socialist programs.
The nomination of Sonia Sotomayor by President Obama presents an opportunity for the Republican Party to make some real headway in the struggle for the support of the American people. That is, if it has the courage and the smarts to take advantage of the opening we have been given. Obama and Sotomayor share the same worldview and the same goals. Both reject the Constitution they are sworn to protect and defend.
Neither understands the meaning of a constitutional government or the historical importance of the Constitution to the continuing liberty and indeed, the very existence of America. The discussion of Sotomayor during the confirmation process gives the Republicans a rare three-month opportunity to educate the American people about the principles on which the most successful nation in history was built.
While most Americans do not fully appreciate the Constitution as it relates to their daily lives, almost all of them have a reverence for the “idea” of the Constitution. By using the Sotomayor confirmation process as an opportunity to clearly inform the American people about the importance of constitutional and republican principles such as limited government, elimination of unnecessary taxes, and a strong national defense, we can set the stage for a “wipeout” of Democrats in the 2010 and 2012 elections.